Aberdeen City Council - Trading Standards Service

The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002

A Brief Introduction

A minimum set of common consumer rights on faulty goods in each EU country is
provided for by Directive 1999/44/EC on the Sale of Consumer Goods ("the
Directive"). One aim of the Directive is to encourage people to shop across borders,
knowing they have protection if anything is wrong with the products they buy.
Existing UK law has been retained but slightly amended, mainly to give effect to
specific remedies which, although they have been in use for many years, have not
previously been part of the law. These amendments are contained in the Sale and
Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations ("the Regulations"), in force from 31
March 2003. This brief Guide is to explain the operation of the law in the UK.

The Regulations apply to a range of transactions between businesses and consumers,
including the sale and supply of goods, hire and hire-purchase. "Consumers" are
defined as people who are buying for purposes not related to their trade, business or
profession. The Regulations do not apply to services in general nor do they apply to
second hand goods sold at auctions that the consumer has the opportunity of
attending in person.

When goods are faulty, a consumer can generally only obtain a legal remedy against
the retailer. Consumers are generally not able to claim directly against the
manufacturer. Consumers may have additional rights under any guarantees supplied
with the goods or against a credit card company or finance house if the goods are
purchased by means of credit and have a price of over Ł100.

A Simple Summary (see flow chart below)

Consumers are entitled to goods of satisfactory quality, taking account of any
description, the price and other relevant circumstances. If an item has a fault that is
present at the time of sale, the consumer can complain once it is discovered.

Consumers cannot expect a legal remedy in respect of:

• fair wear and tear;

• misuse or accidental damage; or

• if they decide they no longer want the item.

Similarly, consumers cannot expect a legal remedy where goods have faults that they
knew about before the sale or that should have been evident on reasonable inspection.

Remedies

If a product that was faulty at the time of sale is returned to the retailer, the consumer
is legally entitled to:

• a full refund, if this is within a reasonable time of the sale ("reasonable time"
is not defined in law but is often quite short); or

• a reasonable amount of compensation (or "damages") for up to six years
from the date of sale (five years after discovery of the problem in Scotland).

This does not mean all goods have to last six years! It is the limit for making a claim
in respect of a fault that was present at the time of sale. It is not equivalent to a
guarantee. These are long-established rights and they remain available to the
consumer after the Regulations come into force on 31 March 2003.

Under the Regulations, consumers can choose to request instead:

• a repair or replacement.

The retailer can decline either of these if he can show that they are disproportionately
costly in comparison with the alternative. However, any remedy must also be
completed without significant inconvenience to the consumer. If neither repair nor
replacement is realistically possible, consumers can request instead:

• a partial or full refund, depending on what is reasonable in the
circumstances.

It may be the case that a full refund is not the reasonable option because the
consumer will have enjoyed some benefit from the goods before the problem
appeared. This needs to be taken into account before a reasonable partial refund can
be assessed.

As illustrated in the flow chart below, consumers can switch between certain
remedies if they find they are getting nowhere down the route originally selected.
However, they would have to give a retailer a reasonable time to honour a request
before they tried to switch, and they could never pursue two remedies at the same
time.

Proving the fault

Generally, the consumer needs to demonstrate the goods were faulty at the time of
sale. This is so if the consumer chooses to request an immediate refund or
compensation (damages). It is also the case for any product returned more than six
months after the date of the sale.

There is one exception. This is when a consumer returns goods in the first six
months from the date of the sale, and requests a repair or replacement or, thereafter, a
partial or full refund. In that case, the consumer does not have to prove the goods
were faulty at the time of the sale. It is assumed that they were. If the retailer does
not agree, it is for him to prove that the goods were satisfactory at the time of sale.

Other situations covered

The remedies of repair, replacement, partial refund and full refund are also available
to consumers:

• where installation by the retailer is not satisfactory;
• where installation instructions have serious shortcomings;
• generally where a good does not match the public statements made about it by
the retailer, manufacturer, importer or producer; and
• where a specially commissioned product has relevant failings.

These are greatly simplified explanations and they are expanded on in the
20 page guide that DTI have available on the DTI’s web site

Alternative dispute resolution

Although consumers do sometimes take court action, in day-to-day practice this is a
rare event. In the vast majority of cases, the consumer and retailer are able to reach a
satisfactory solution without any need to consider going to court. Where this is not
possible, use of an alternative dispute resolution procedure or trade association
scheme can be considered. Details may be sought from the retailer, the Community
Legal Service or a Citizens Advice Bureau.

Aberdeen City Council, Trading Standards Service,
St. Nicholas House, Broad Street, Aberdeen, AB10 1BX
Telephone: (01224) 523737 Fax: (01224) 645786

Web http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/Aberdeen/
E-Mail: tradingstandards@aberdeencity.gov.uk