![]() |
![]()
TRADING STANDARDS INSPECTIONS AND YOUR BUSINESS INTRODUCTION Officers from Coventry Trading Standards enforce a wide range of consumer protection legislation to promote a fair and safe trading environment for consumer and honest trader alike. Enforcement is carried out by routine inspections, sampling of goods/services and by investigating complaints. This section describes what to expect when your business is inspected and what to do if you think the outcome of the inspection is wrong or unfair. Who Will Inspect Your Business? Risk Individual trading addresses in Coventry are 'risk rated' by Trading Standards according to various criteria including turnover, previous history, potential risk, hazardous activities and legal complexity. This enables us to use our limited resources more effectively and visit the 'higher risk' premises more frequently. What Are You Entitled to Expect from the Officer? What Powers Do Officers Have?
If you intentionally obstruct Officers by refusing to comply with their requirements, or fail to give assistance without reasonable cause - you may be charged with an offence.
What Can You Do If You Think The Outcome Is Unfair?
Finally, Remember:
Powers Under Which Inspection may be Made Statutory Powers contained in: Agriculture Act 1970 Part IV Agriculture (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1968 Animal Health Act 1981 Construction Products Regulations 1991 Consumer Credit Act 1974 Consumer Protection Act 1987 Estate Agents Act 1979 Fair Trading Act 1973 Food & Environmental Protection Act 1985 Food Safety Act 1990 General Product Safety Regulations 2005 Hallmarking Act 1973 Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992 Poisons Act 1972 Prices Acts 1974/1975 Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 Road Traffic Acts 1988 and 1991 Trade Descriptions Act 1968 Trade Marks Act 1994 Timeshare Act 1992 Video Recordings Act 1984 Weights and Measures Act 1985 and any other Regulations or Orders made under these Acts as amended. NB: This is not an exhaustive list of the powers and legislation enforced by Trading Standards.
Summary of Officers' Powers This section should be considered as a summary only as it is impracticable to list all the powers in full for each statute. The powers will vary between each statute. Power to Enter Premises and Inspect Goods A duly authorised officer may at all reasonable times and on production of his/her credentials if requested, enter any business premises and inspect any goods, and, if so authorised, inspect any weighing or measuring equipment. Power to Request or Require Books, Documents or Records Prices Act 1974 An Officer can require the production of documents relating to the business and may make copies. Food Safety Act 1990 An Officer may inspect any records, in whatever form they are held. Where records are kept on computer, the Officer should be given access to the computer apparatus including any associated apparatus and may require assistance to operate the computer or apparatus. Consumer Credit Act 1974, #Consumer Protection Act 1987, Estate Agents Act 1979, Fair Trading Act 1973, Hallmarking Act 1973, Property Misdescriptions Act 1991, Time Share Act 1992, Trade Descriptions Act 1968, Trade Marks Act 1994, Video Recordings Act 1984 If an Officer has reasonable cause to suspect an offence has been committed, (s)he may require the production of books or documents (#records), and may take copies of them. Powers of Seizure Weights and Measures Act 1985 An Officer may seize and detain weighing or measuring equipment if (s)he has reasonable cause to believe it may be liable to be forfeited. An Officer may seize and detain documents or goods that (s)he believes may be required as evidence. *Consumer Protection Act 1987, **Consumer Credit Act 1974, Fair Trading Act 1973, Hallmarking Act 1973, Trade Descriptions Act 1968, Trade Marks Act 1994, Video Recordings Act 1984 If an Officer has reasonable cause to believe an offence has been committed (s)he may seize and detain any goods in order to ascertain whether an offence has been committed. If an Officer believes they may be required as evidence (s)he may seize and detain any goods or documents, (*goods or records) (**goods books or documents). If necessary, in order to seize goods (*goods or records) (**goods. books or documents), (s)he may require a person having authority to do so, to break open any container, or if refused, (s)he may break open the container him/herself. Food Safety Act 1990 If an Officer has reason to believe they may be required as evidence, (s)he may seize and detain any records, and where records are held on computer, may require them to be produced in a form that can be taken away. This information is produced for Coventry businesses and is intended for guidance only. It is not a legal document and does not attempt to cover all situations. Anyone who wants to know exactly how a particular Act affect them, should refer to the legislation itself or take suitable legal advice. Dec 2005 |
|
INTRODUCTION It is a general principle in criminal law that the prosecution has to prove that the person accused of a criminal offence is guilty beyond reasonable doubt and usually it has to be proved that the accused had the intention of breaking the law. However there are exceptions to this general principle. A number of pieces of legislation contain 'Strict Liability Offences'. These impose an absolute prohibition against doing something where 'consumer protection' has been deemed to be paramount. For such offences it does not matter that there is no intention to break the law, it is sufficient to show that the law has been broken for an offence to be committed. Clearly strict liability offences can cause injustice if a person is held to be guilty of an offence because of an accident or some other cause beyond his control. Therefore in order to introduce a balance, a due diligence defence has normally been added to Consumer Protection legislation which creates these strict liability offences. STATUTORY DEFENCE Examples of Consumer Protection legislation which impose strict liability offences and which have similar Statutory defences are shown below: *Consumer Credit Act 1974 *Consumer Protection Act 1987 *Fair Trading Act 1973 *Food Safety Act 1990 *General Product Safety Regulations 2005 *Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 *Trade Descriptions Act 1968 *Video Recordings Act 1984 *Weights and Measures Act 1985 At the heart of these Defence Sections is the need for a person or Company to show that they : - took all reasonable precautions AND exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence NB Both parts of the defence must be proved to be successful. GUIDELINES None of the laws which provide due diligence defences define what would satisfy the defence. Although case law has outlined some important principles, ultimately it is for a Court of Law who will decide the facts in each case. However, Trading Standards would offer the following general points of guidance.
This information outlines in general terms the Due Diligence defence. It is not a legal document and it does not attempt to cover all situations. Anyone who wants to know exactly how a particular Act affects them should refer to the legislation itself or take suitable legal advice. Jan 2006
| |
|
Copyright © Coventry
Trading Standards Service 2001- 2008
Coventry, Trading Standards Service, Broadgate House,
Broadgate, Coventry, West Midlands CV1 1NH
|